Changes to the Rule Governing Hits to the Head (Rule 48):
Changes to the Boarding Rule (Rule 41):
Are NHL players better protected against head shots and other dangerous hits?:
As with any NHL rule change, it all comes down to how it's interpreted on the ice. Enforcement is largely a matter of judgment and practical application, with parameters set by NHL head office and the general managers.
In the case of a new or evolving rule, referees have been known to alter the standard of enforcement in the middle of a season, and it often takes a couple of years before the true impact of a rule change can be assessed.
But here's how the new wording of the rulebook allows the possibility for change when it comes to head shots and other dangerous hits:
The Head Shot Rule
The rule is more comprehensive than before. It no longer matters which direction the attacker comes from. The onus is on him to avoid aiming above the opponent's shoulders.
But the new wording also places more responsibility on the player receiving the hit. Referees are instructed to consider all circumstances of the incident, including "whether the opponent put himself in a vulnerable position immediately prior to or simultaneously with the hit."
Not all contact with the head results in a penalty. Referees must take into account whether "head contact on an otherwise legal body check was unavoidable."
A two-minute minor penalty is now in place for an illegal hit to the head. That didn't exist before: a five-minute major was the minimum penalty. Making the punishment less extreme will hopefully encourage referees to enforce the rule. No ref wants to call a five-minute major unless he has to. But minor penalties are common.
Rule 48 no longer includes a provision for a 5-minute major or game misconduct. If the referee believes a hit to the head deserves more than two minutes, he can call a match penalty for deliberate attempt to injure.
The Boarding Rule
The wording of the boarding penalty has always acknowledged "an enormous amount of judgment" by referees, and that won't change.
The phrase "impact with the boards" now appears a couple of times, suggesting that a hit into the boards can be judged a penalty even if the collision itself doesn't look severe or violent.
As in Rule 48 (above) the onus is on the player receiving the hit to avoid putting himself in a vulnerable position.
The NHL acknowledges that a referee might miss an infraction under Rule 41 and Rule 48, or might not be in a position to judge the severity of a hit. So the the league has the right to issue a suspension for boarding or a hit to the head even if no penalty was issued during the game.


