The L.A. Kings' decision to sack the coach is getting mixed reviews. Some see Andy Murray as a good man who wore out his welcome. Others say it's a desperation move that probably won't work.
Whether justified or not, the coach is almost always the first victim of underperforming teams, unrealistic expectations, or the dumb trades and poor drafting of his superiors.
If you were an NHL GM, you'd fire the coach too. It's about the only worthwhile, risk-free move available to a hockey executive under siege:
A coach does not have to be traded, put on waivers or sent to the minors. Just call him in and tell him it's over. You have to keep paying him, but it doesn't count against your salary cap.
Replacing a key player is tricky. But you can always find a good coach. The field is so crowded that Dave King, one of the best minds in the game, had to go to Siberia to get a job. There's always someone out there just as qualified as the guy you fired.
What if the team doesn't respond to the new man? So what? If you're ready to fire the coach, you've already concluded that things can't get much worse. The risk that a coaching move will backfire is minimal.
Fire the coach? A man would be a fool not to.
Comments
No comments yet. Leave a Comment